メインコンテンツへスキップ
Mars: In-line arrayed X-ray system >
プラットフォーム
分野別ソリューション
すべての業界
バッテリー
医療機器
消費財
スポーツ用品
自動車
航空宇宙/防衛
農業と食品
電子機器
用途別アプリケーション
各種資料
技術資料
ケーススタディ
オンラインセミナー
Blog
Insights from lumafield
Go/No-Go
Manufacturing podcast
First Article
Editorial Publication
企業情報
会社概要
採用情報
プレスリリース
Events
Voyager を起動
お問い合わせはこちら
メニュー
製品業界
業界
すべての業界
電子機器
医療機器
自動車
消費財
バッテリー
農業と食品
航空宇宙/防衛
スポーツ用品
[アプリケーション]
リソース
リソース
ホワイトペーパー
101
オンラインセミナー
最初の記事
Go/No-Go Podcast
First Article
会社
会社
について
採用情報
プレス
Events
セールスに問い合わせる
ボイジャーを起動
© 2000 Lumafield. All Rights Reserved.
Quality AgentFoundation modelAIM
Lumafield AI Research

A model of the manufactured world.

Lumafield’s foundation model discerns patterns in physical products that no one else can see, because it learns from a kind of data no one else has.
Industrial X-ray CT is a record of what actually happened when design met material, tooling, assembly, heat, pressure, handling, and time.
Object 01 / Smartphone: The inside of an ordinary object is an extraordinary dataset.

Pick up a phone. It feels like a single thing: a smooth slab of glass, aluminum, silicon, adhesives, and battery chemistry that fits in your hand.

Inside, it’s a small civilization. Thousands of components made their way through sprawling supply chains before converging on an assembly line where microns make all the difference. The battery layers have to align. Solder joints must form. Adhesives need to fill some gaps while staying out of others. Antennas, cameras, shields, and connectors all have to land in the right place.

While a phone is already intricate enough, that’s just the beginning. A car contains tens of thousands of parts. An aircraft contains millions. The nature of modern manufacturing is such that complexity necessarily disappears: each supplier delivers a component, each station completes an operation, each inspection checks a list of known risks, and a finished object emerges at the other end, hiding all of the steps that went into making it.

The miracle is that this works as often as it does. The danger arises when a failure sneaks in among all that complexity, only popping its head up when the product is in a customer’s hands.

The worst defect isn’t the one that fails a check. It’s the one no one thought to check.

Manufacturers have built formidable systems for measuring known characteristics and addressing failures they expect, but every inspection plan has limitations. By defining what matters in advance, it stops short of what might matter most. A new failure mode slips through because it hasn’t earned its spot on the checklist just yet.

The record of what we really built

A CAD model denotes intent. Visual inspection records a surface. A test answers the question it set out to ask. Industrial CT records the product exactly as built, inside and out, down to features a few microns across.

Figure 02: This cluster representation gathers scans with useful similarities near one another. Labels are applied after engineers review the physical evidence

The physical record

For the past seven years, Lumafield has been building industrial X-ray CT systems that allow engineers to look inside the products they’re building without destroying them. Those systems produce three-dimensional images of internal geometry and material distribution: battery layers, solder joints, seals, fibers, voids, cracks, inclusions, and the countless small assembly choices beneath a product’s surface.

One scan reveals a void. But a large population of parts shows whether the void is random, whether it follows a tool, whether it belongs to a supplier, or whether it’s an early, ominous warning that a process is drifting.

This is the dataset behind our foundation model. It’s unique for three reasons:

It’s volumetric. It contains internal relationships that surface imaging can’t capture.
It records outcomes. CT shows the final result of manufacturing.
It spans populations: variation across products, processes, materials, suppliers, and time.

We’ve trained a model to turn those volumes into useful representations: compressed numerical descriptions that record physical structure and capture the relationships between different samples. No human is naming the features in advance. Instead, the model learns by identifying patterns across a massive collection of scans.

[Caption] Figure 02: This cluster representation gathers scans with useful similarities near one another. Labels are applied after engineers review the physical evidence. 

Learning what belongs together

The easiest way to understand this representation is to imagine a map. Every scan is a point somewhere on it. The model places products near one another when their internal construction is similar, and far apart when it’s different.

The model’s map has more dimensions than a person can draw, but two-dimensional projections make some of its structure visible. Batteries with similar layer winding, electrode spacing, weld geometry, and housings form a small city. Connectors with related contact construction amass elsewhere. A unit with different PCB components from all of its peers sits apart.

In this scenario, preconceived ideas of what matters take a back seat. No engineer has to decide beforehand that electrode spacing is the feature worth focusing on. The model preserves relationships that become useful later, when the question comes up.

From cluster to root cause

The model may be responding to any number of part-specific factors. That’s why the real work begins after the pattern appears. At least for now, a human in the loop makes sense of the findings. An engineer returns to the CT volumes, identifies the physical features behind the pattern, connects them to manufacturing context, and tests the hypothesis. The conclusion has to survive contact with the real world.

‍

‍

Bring us your biggest quality problem.

可視性評価をリクエストして、不足しているものと、それによってどれだけのコストがかかっているかを確認してください。
評価をリクエストする
世界の”ものづくり”を変える。
分野別ソリューション
バッテリー
医療機器
消費財
スポーツ用品
自動車
航空宇宙/防衛
農業と食品
電子機器
すべての業界
用途別アプリケーション
リバースエンジニアリング
ファースト・アーティクル・インスペクション (FAI)
品質保証と品質管理
寸法測定
故障解析
材料特性評価
欠陥検出
競合ベンチマークと分析
組み立て検証
設計検証と妥当性の確認
サプライヤー適格性評価
非破壊検査 (NDT)
すべてのアプリケーション
製品
ネプチューントリトンボイジャーMars
各種資料
学習コンテンツメディア技術資料ウェビナーオンラインセミナー初回CTスキャン分析ガイドケーススタディCT入門エンジニアブログ
企業情報
ログイン会社概要採用情報プレスリリースブログお問い合わせ

ニュースレターに登録する

info@lumafield.com
プライバシー情報セキュリティ導入サービス契約
© 2000 ルマフィールド。全著作権所有。