Skip to main content
New Performance scanners are here >
Platform
Solutions
All Industries
Aerospace and Defense
Agriculture and Food
Athletic Equipment
Automotive
Batteries
Consumer Packaged Goods
Electronics
Medical Devices
Applications
Resources
White Papers
Case Studies
Webinars
Blog
Insights from lumafield
Go/No-Go
Manufacturing podcast
First Article
Editorial Publication
Company
About
Careers
Press
Events
Launch Voyager
Contact Sales
Menu
PlatformSolutions
Industries
All Industries
Agriculture and Food
Electronics
Aerospace and Defense
Automotive
Athletic Equipment
Consumer Packaged Goods
Medical Devices
Batteries
Applications
Resources
Resources
White Papers
Case Studies
Webinars
Blog
Go/No-Go Podcast
First Article
Company
Company
About
Careers
Press
Events
Contact Sales
Launch Voyager
© 2000 Lumafield. All Rights Reserved.
Lumafield cost of quality report industrial X-ray CT scan background
Featured REsource

The Lumafield Cost of Quality Report

Quality costs every manufacturer money. Most don’t know how much.

Ready to dive into our findings?
Get the Report

210

quality decision-makers surveyed across the US and Canada.

58%

think at least a quarter of their organization’s Cost of Quality (COQ) is not measured.

42%

spend over 5% of their revenue on COQ-related activities.

62%

say tariffs and other trade barriers have made it harder to ensure quality.

77%

still use manual visual inspection in their quality processes.

80%

are already using AI-based tools to support product quality or inspection.

Quality costs manufacturers billions of dollars every year, and most believe they aren't capturing the full picture. More than 40% of the decision-makers we surveyed estimate that quality-related costs exceed 5% of their revenue, and the majority think even that figure understates the truth.

To understand how manufacturers are actually measuring and managing their Cost of Quality today, Lumafield commissioned an independent survey of 210 quality decision-makers across aerospace and defense, automotive, consumer electronics, consumer packaged goods, and medical devices in the US and Canada. This novel dataset provides a cross-industry benchmark of COQ practices, priorities, and gaps from the professionals managing them today.

The results reveal a consistent gap between what manufacturers track and what quality actually costs them, how supplier risk, inspection labor, and emerging technology are reshaping priorities across industries, and where the greatest opportunities for improvement remain.

Get the Report
Take the quiz yourself

What we found:

Measurement gaps

Most manufacturers track quality costs in some form, but only 35% use a comprehensive model and 58% believe at least 25% of their true COQ goes unaccounted for. Optimization opportunities are being left on the table.

Tariffs and supplier risk

Supplier-related quality issues ranked as the top priority across every industry we surveyed. Tariffs are making it worse: 54% of respondents say their suppliers have downgraded quality to offset tariff costs, and 27% report suppliers misrepresenting country of origin.

Tech adoption trends

AI and automated inspection are already delivering results, but adoption is uneven. The organizations capturing the most value are the ones that have built the data infrastructure to make the technology useful.

Download the full Lumafield Cost of Quality Report to discover:

  • A cross-industry benchmark of how North American manufacturers across industries are measuring and managing their COQ today.
  • How supplier risk, tariffs, and trade disruptions are affecting manufacturers.
  • Detailed industry-level insights for aerospace and defense, automotive, consumer electronics, consumer packaged goods, and medical devices.
  • How AI and automated inspection are changing what manufacturers can see and act on.

Learn how your organization compares to other North American manufacturers on Cost of Quality, measurement, and quality priorities by taking the quiz yourself.

Never ship another bad product.

Protect your reputation and bottom line with CT inspection.

Contact our team
changing the way
the world makes
everything
Solutions
Aerospace and Defense
Agriculture and Food
Athletic Equipment
Automotive
Batteries
Consumer Packaged Goods
Electronics
Medical Devices
All Industries
Applications
Assembly Verification
Competitive Benchmarking and Analysis
Defect Detection
Design Verification and Validation
Dimensional Measurement
Failure Analysis
First Article Inspection (FAI)
Material Characterization
Non-Destructive Testing (NDT)
Quality Assurance and Control (QA & QC)
Reverse Engineering
Supplier Qualification
All Applications
Products
NeptuneTritonVoyagerAtlas
Resources
LearnFirst ArticleWhite PapersEventsWebinarsSupportCase StudiesCT 101Engineers' Blog
Company
LoginAboutCareersPressBlogContact

Sign up for our newsletter

info@lumafield.com
PrivacyInformation SecurityDeployment Services Agreement
© 2000 Lumafield. All Rights Reserved.